Destroying SC for Politics…County by County
As a blogger and a political junkie, I know a lot about politics. It’s my hobby. Why in the hell I’d choose something like politics as a hobby over say…riding a horse…is beyond me. Because Lord knows, I’d much rather be riding a horse in my spare time instead of worrying about things that are so far out of my control to change. I normally just try to get a grip, sit on it for a bit and hope that good will prevail, the people will see the truth and true leaders will stand up for what is right in the end.
I know what you’re thinking….she must be kidding herself and I am…pretty much. I definitely don’t see that very often in SC. Unfortunately, what I do see in our state are people trying to push narrow, self-centered agendas on our entire population via corruption and manipulation instead of allowing the system to work for the people.
And now it’s affecting Spartanburg and it’s really starting to tick me off.
Politics is SO confusing and the more confusing it is…the more politicians can get away with…so bear with me as I attempt to get through some of this.
People send me stuff and I read it. I could share a lot of information, some public…some not so public…with y’all. Like the article that came out in an independent Columbia newspaper last year titled “The Hit List” that was about Governor Sanford’s ploy to unseat certain legislators that didn’t agree with him on school vouchers, for instance. Or I could share a private email I got a few weeks ago alleging that the consultant running Rep. Bob Walker’s (House District 38) campaign this past year assisted in orchestrating his loss from the get-go by doing things like simultaneously sending out mailers in favor of his opponent, Joey Millwood.
Unethical? Illegal? I don’t know. If I were Mr. Walker I’d certainly have my lawyers look into it. I just don’t have the time which is normally why I don't share those things on my blog.
And even if I did have the time, those accused would just say, ‘ahhh, that’s some sort of political conspiracy theory’ and remind everyone that I’m a liberal therefore convincing citizens they shouldn’t pay me much attention. I know that. I’m very familiar with SC politics. I’ve watched the “liberal” media and other bloggers scream about the power of outside influences in SC politics until they were blue in the face for the past couple of years. You hear us say it. You think about it…and maybe you think “ahhhhhh, that’s the liberal media” or maybe you give it thought and think…would that really work? Could they do that? Could they really manipulate voters and an election in such a way?
I don't know…could they?
I mean…surely, at this point, we can all agree that outside sources have been funneling tons of money into this state in an effort to push a libertarian political agenda. Surely, every citizen has seen or heard that news somewhere. Howard Rich, who funds much of these efforts has been pretty up front about what he’s up to in SC and about 8 other states. Why would he be up front? Why not? He knows the average person won’t pay any attention anyway especially if he tosses the word “liberal” into the mix against those who disagree with them. These days he also uses RINO (republican in name only) a lot too.
Now don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying libertarians don’t have just as much a right to stand up in this democracy and work for what you believe is the right direction for this country. I understand the ideals behind smaller government and support citizens standing up for those beliefs. What I am saying is that when you have to sneak around to make progress on your ideals, manipulate funding loopholes, voters and other politicians in an effort to get there—THAT is where I have a real problem with it. Because you're hurting other people in the process.
Which brings me to Spartanburg County.
Being familiar with the Governor’s hit list, I was well aware that Bob Walker was a target as was Spartanburg’s Lanny Littlejohn, Keith Kelly, John Hawkins and Jim Ritchie (all republicans). When I read that article back in January of 2008…did I REALLY believe or want to believe that people would go so far to fund the campaign of some easily controlled, average guy like Joey Millwood and get a consulting company to go along with it (this ‘consultant’ is also in the article as a major ‘hit list’ player) all because of school vouchers?
No–of course I didn't want to believe it. But, then…I saw their successes and I admit, I got a little worried. Although Littlejohn & Kelly won, Hawkins didn’t run because he knew he’d lose because his opponent Lee Bright was funded by Rich & Co, Ritchie lost to Shane Martin and Walker lost to Joey Millwood and today…3 of these new legislators are holding Spartanburg’s entire legislative delegation hostage and hurting Spartanburg.
Why? Well, I hear a lot of reasons. "The Governor doesn't like Littlejohn." "Judicial Appointments." "Anger over the appointment of Judge Beatty to the SC Supreme Court." "Reauthorization of district lines." "Magistrate appointments." And just today, I heard NASCAR thinks Shane Martin will be the next Lt. Governor or run against Bob Inglis. (hell, even I didn't think NASCAR's out of state funding was an issue during the election…I was obviously wrong).
Regardless, this is stuff that doesn't affect every day South Carolinians who are living their lives, feeding their kids, paying their bills, working at their jobs….you get the point. These are pretty much self-serving, immature 'reasons' all under the guise that "it's the right thing to do."
This is hurting Spartanburg and it is Shane Martin, Lee Bright, Joey Millwood and Glenn Reese that don't care about Spartanburg right now. And Spartanburg should be upset.
The Spartanburg delegation has always chosen a chair by a majority rule vote…why? Why not? Who cares? It doesn't matter who the Chair is. Well, until now and the 3 new legislators (along with democrat Glenn Reese–such a disappointment) want to use weighted voting because that is what is law…which okay…fine. But, if the new legislators want this change, why can't they work as professionals and transition to that change as a collective in a way that is respectful of everyone? You know? You're supposed to be freaking leaders…not bullies.
And by the way, can you guess who’s helping the 4 out? The Governor.
Yeah…surprise. The 'hit list' should make more sense now.
So, these days, as I get to watch my local leaders beg these grown men to not compromise our community’s well being for this political agenda, I can’t help but get mad as hell. I bust my butt in this community, as do many other people, only to watch a few selfish people with unrealistic political aspirations screw it up.
I can't help but wonder if similar things like this are happening in counties across SC?
Anyway, I don't know what these people think they are going to gain by playing underhanded dirty politics. I’m willing to bet that if you have to create a ‘hit list’ to win elections you will fail in the long run.
So, all I can do, in addition to hoping for some incredible karma to come the way of dirty politicians, is to ask that citizens please pay attention and really try to understand the motives behind every action of our elected officials. I know it is hard but we have to be smart and work together despite political differences. Please make every effort to question these people and seek to understand what they are up to.
Times are hard and they are only getting worse. We need to come together and take care of our communities–not play games.
We need to send a message to these boys that the rest of us are tired of it. The majority of us have real lives to live and we would appreciate it if you would step up and help us out like you vowed to do when you took that oath. That includes at the highest level of this state.
If nothing else, stop hurting Spartanburg. It's not yours to destroy.
t

on 06 Feb 2009 at 4:28 am # Wes Wolfe
Unfortunately, for those who want results, politics are sports in this state. Especially considering the subterfuge that went down in the primary campaigns last year. Some people will never acknowledge their guilt. And so it goes.
on 06 Feb 2009 at 10:25 am # Sburg Dem
Tammy, as a Spartanburg Democrat it pains me to say that I am jealous of what the Howie Rich/Sanford/etc. crowd has been able to do, esp. here in Spartanburg County. I am jealous because they came into Spartanburg and challenged the only political game in town (the GOP establishment) and in many ways won. As much as I love the folks in the local Dem Party, it is virtually a nonfactor in this county. They are operating as if it was the 1970′s when everyone here was a Democrat. I am jealous of the Howie Rich forces because I want a well-funded, forward-thinking, Democratic-aligned movement to do the same thing.
on 06 Feb 2009 at 10:38 am # tammy
Sburg Dem,
you’re probably not alone…I’m sure there are plenty of democrats that would like to play dirty, unethical politics just to win at least every once in a while…because it sucks to continually lose all the time. Believe me, I understand. I just don’t have it in me. I wouldn’t want to be a part of lying, cheating and manipulating to win. I know there will always be dirty politics, but I think Barack Obama just proved you don’t have to play hardcore dirty politics to win.
on 06 Feb 2009 at 12:33 pm # Sburg Dem
Tammy, thanks for responding to my comments. I think I was misunderstood though. I do not like their dirty politics and manipulation either. What I like is that people with a particular ideology offered voters a well-organized and viable alternative to the status quo (within their own party no less). We would have all assumed that Scott Talley, Bob Walker, and Jim Ritchie would get relected because they are Republicans in safe districts. But people stepped forward and took them on. I know that Bright and Millwood are phonies, but the people behind them actually accomplished something electorally. The reason I am jealous is because I don’t see the Democratic Party in Spartanburg or in SC stepping up and challenging the status quo politicians. Will Rothchild gave it an outstanding try but he had no money or movement behind him. We had no Democrat running against Lee Bright exposing who was funding him and what his agenda is. A lot of these Westside families (where I live) are Republican but they also love their public schools. We as Democrats in SC talk about keeping vouchers out, but then we allow candidates like Bright to go unchallenged. I guess I just hope that some deep pockets of our own step forward and help fund Dem candidates to run in semi-competitive districts around the state who articulate a smart forward thinking vision for the state.
on 06 Feb 2009 at 2:04 pm # tammy
Sorry if I misunderstood.
Maybe with Obama more people will come out and support democrats more openly in the south. The south is a hard place for Democrats to run and many just don’t even feel comfortable being active. It is a climate we must work to change…no doubt.
As for the republicans…the SC GOP is an odd bird these days. Mark Sanford is libertarian and SC Republicans have lost control of their party…it’s interesting to watch them attack each other. Because they don’t know who to trust anymore. Unfortunately, we’re all going to start suffering because of that infighting because they are the ones running our state. I guess the good thing about our state being out of money…is that they don’t have anymore to waste! Not to mention, this split will continue to weaken their Party over time hopefully opening doors for Democrats.
That said, I hope we’re organized enough to take advantage of the opportunity.
on 06 Feb 2009 at 2:18 pm # Shanks Evans
If weighted voting is to be the rule, then why is it necessary to elect 13 legislators in Spartanburg County? The gang of 4 have effectively sought to disenfranshise me since they claim my House member’s vote doesn’t count. State law or not (and I’ve yet to see the state code cited) disenfranchisement of the rest of the voters in Spartanburg County should trouble us all.
on 06 Feb 2009 at 9:05 pm # RLB
Shanks–I don’t think they are claiming your State House rep’s vote does not count. The way weighted voting works is this: Fifty percent of the total vote is divided up among the four senators whose districts include parts of the county, and then 50% is divided up among all the house members. Each legislators percentage is based on the population of their district. That means if the three main Senators for Spartanburg County (Reese, Bright and Martin), who collectively represent ropbably close to 99% of the county, and only one House member (Millwood) all team up together then they have a weighted vote of over 50%. So unless you live in the extremely small portion of the county represented by Senator Harvey Peeler from Cherokee County, then your State Senator is in the Gang of Four. It is not that your House member (assuming it is not Millwood) was disenfranchised, it is just that he is in the weighted voting minority on the issue of voting for chairman and the delegation appointents.
on 08 Feb 2009 at 2:56 pm # Shanks Evans
RLB – Fifty percent plus one renders my House member irrelevant. If the delegation operated the one man, one vote system, his vote counts as much as the next guy. But in Rich-land, where his vote apparently counts as three-fifths of a vote or less, he is irrelevant. So, why elect him at all? I don’t agree with my Senator’s position on this issue and desire to have my House member’s vote negate my Senator’s misguided position. Unfortunately, that can’t happen.
on 08 Feb 2009 at 8:34 pm # Leon
RLB you can explain it all you like and I’ve heard Martin, Bright and Millwood say the same thing.
The average voter still believes in one man, one vote. They explain it and it comes across like this:
Because say, California is so much more populated than say, Rhode Island, CA should get 18 United States senators and Rhode Island should get 1. After all they represent more people.
You can explain it all you want, the average Spartanburg citizen along with the average American still believes in one man one vote no matter how many times you try to explain or advocate for weighted voting.
on 10 Feb 2009 at 2:51 am # Mike
Shanks and Leon-I have to say that I agree with RLB on this one. I too believe in the principle of one man, one vote and that it is indispensible to democracy. But your arguments in favor of this principle really relate to the legislative process itself – actually voting on bills and making laws. What RLB is talking about and what this whole controversy is about is voting for things like chairman of a county delegation. Voting for a delegation chair is essentially a quasi-governmental function not on the same level as passing bills. The county delegation is not an official “governing body” but rather a quasi-governmental entity. In this situation one should look to state statutes to determine if weighted voting should be used, not simply the principle of one man one vote.
I think it is important to note that the concept of weighted voting in politics (outside of legislating) is not that foreign of an idea. Just look at how the parties select their nominees for president. Obama had a lot of help winning the Democratic nomination thanks to weighted voting. In the 2008 Democratic presidential primary here in South Carolina…a type of weighted voting system was used (and in other states as well) to assign delegates to Obama, Clinton, and Edwards based on their shares of the vote in each of the six congressional districts. The 6th CD is allocated more delegates to send to Denver than the 4th CD because the 6th is a high-performing Democratic district. So my vote to send a delegate to represent my candidate in Denver may not have counted as much as someone from Orangeburg. Weighted voting was even more evident in the Texas primary -Clinton won more overall votes but Obama won more delegates because most of the CD’s he won were high-performing Democratic districts and were allocated more delegates to begin with.
on 10 Feb 2009 at 6:57 pm # Shanks Evans
Mike – I don’t agree with the weighted delegate selection process the Democrat party uses, and I don’t think it appropriate for our legislative delegation. Don’t minimize the importance of the votes the delegates make at the county level. Appointments to fire district commissions alone are important enough for me to want the entire delegation to weigh in. Take the Arkwright Fire District controversy from a few years ago. Though I don’t live in AFD’s district, I certainly want those residents’ fire taxes to be spent wisely and judiciously enough that they are afforded the best fire protection they can get. While the system failed in that case, the one man, one vote system provides the mechanism to stop bad appointments. Weighted voting does not.